Archive for the ‘Public Information Bureau’ Category

Hogwarts and Police Psychology

by Drs. Gary Aumiller and Scott Stubenrauch (Guest Blogger)

What if we told you that Hogwarts was real and police psychology is used frequently with the new students? What if there really was a Sorting Hat that could define your personality and place you into a specific house? However, instead of four houses (Gryffindor, Slytherin, Hufflepuff, and Ravenclaw), there are five: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism (OCEAN). Which one would you choose? Well, if you have a proclivity for adventure and a vivid imagination, you would most likely be sorted into ‘Openness’. Alternatively, if you consider yourself to be more compassionate and empathetic, then 15 points for Agreeableness! Quirky are you? – perhaps Neuroticism.

These five ‘houses’ are actually known in Police Psychology as the ‘Big Five’. These five traits make up what we know to be as someone’s “personality” at least in some theories. You may be thinking to yourself: “Why these five traits? I mean, of all the adjectives we would use to describe my colleague’s personality, none would be so pleasant (and censored) as any of the aforementioned words above. I mean the guy’s a complete jerk. And don’t even get me started on his hygiene…” What? You’re still here…? Oh… this is awkward.  Anyway, to figure out why these five personality traits were picked, we must understand the history of a psychologist named Raymond Cattell, his involvement with factor analysis, and why he is so important to the field of Psychology.

The Importance of Personality Screening

Raymond Cattell was a psychologist who lived in the 1900’s to the 1990’s. He was very interested in how everything was correlated. He used ‘Factor Analysis’, a statistical method used to weed out all the unnecessary variables (factors) that shouldn’tPOLICE PSYCHOLOGY, testing be considered in an analysis. For example, we all know a person’s behavior is comprised of many different factors. Cattell was able to take over 20,000 words that served as descriptors of personality, and through Factor Analysis, he was able to narrow down all the personality traits into 16 relevant factors that make up a person’s full personality profile. In Cattell’s own words, “For psychology to take its place as an effective science, we must become less concerned with grandiose theory than with establishing, through research, certain basic laws of relationship.” Factor Analysis is this complex technique where you throw in a bunch of questions totally unrelated and you get them separated into clusters based on themes, which become a single factor. One of the authors did this on his dissertation, way back when, with computer cards and a couple of days of waiting. Cattell did it with paper and pencil and a slide rule (which is an ancient mathematical torture device that only two students in any class could figure out before computers were around). Nowadays, you can probably do factor analysis on an iPad in seconds.

Thus, Cattell developed the ‘Sixteen Personality Factor (16PF®) Questionnaire’. This test is equivalent to the ‘sorting hat’ of Hogwarts—it can identify your personality, predict which career you would be most likely to pursue, and how well or not so well you may perform in a given position (although it doesn’t sing a catchy song while doing so). Later on, these 16 relevant factors were further narrowed down into the “Big Five” traits as we know them today.

The Institute for Personality and Ability Testing (IPAT), Inc. publishes the 16PF Questionnaire, which is now in its 5th edition. Their clients who use it do so to screen through interested job applicants, identify and develop leaders, provide insights for those looking to explore a college major or new career, and to aid in individual and couples counseling. It has great predictive research and selection reports for police and other first responder personnel. And—in case you haven’t guessed yet—Cattell founded this institution and his family led it until 2007.

As we’re sure you know from reading previous blog posts on this site, those of us in police psychology are very concerned with the various personality traits of our uniformed personnel. It is crucial to know how a policeman would react in a high-stress situation; would he run away or into the fray? (What is a fray, by the way?) Call his mom? Take a selfie? Curl up into a fetal position and cry? Break the law? Enforce the law? None of the above? As it turns out, tests have shown that ‘protective service officers’ are more likely to be cool and collected under pressure. But we don’t limit these personality tests to police officers. If one’s personality isn’t properly understood, he/she could end up in the wrong profession. This is why Raymond Cattell’s 16PF Questionnaire is so important—to ensure that you don’t hire a vegan to be a butcher, an agoraphobic as a public speaker, or the local drug dealer as your pharmacist.  And IPAT, the company started by Cattell (did we tell you that?) has an assessment tool that is perfect for predicting law enforcement officers success on the job. No wonder we like IPAT so much!

Harry Potter changed the world of wizards and muggles when he killed Voldemort (He-who-must-not-be-named). He was a wizard with special power and a vision to be able to defeat Voldemort and return the balance to the world. The author, J.K. Rowling, used tremendous creativity to make you constantly say to yourself “How did she think of that?” Cattell, too, had a special power and a vision. He had the power to see personality characteristics as having a problem of content validity (making up the content arbitrarily) and the vision to apply a complicated mathematical concept to solve the problem. He also had creativity as he created not only the 16PF Questionnaire, but a Culture Fair Intelligence Test, the concept of crystallized and fluid intelligence, and numerous ability tests. And he created the company IPAT to keep his tests alive and to allow the police psychology world to have a choice for testing.

So, similar to Hogwarts without Harry, we do not know what police psychology would be without Raymond Cattell. What we do know, his name covered three questions on the most recent Psychology GRE; IPAT is an essential publisher of testing in police selection; and we are still writing about Cattell years later. He must have had something going for him.

Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D.

Please share this article from down below.

Please join the email list on the top of the sidebar and you can get these sent to you email box.

Come back regularly for more updated blogs on police psychology

Share this Article:

Police Psychology | I Said Blog – Not BLOB

 

The police force has been around for years, and yet police psychology is a relatively new field. police psychology, blobThis is a really fascinating concept, because police stress is not a new thing—it’s as old as the job itself! But expanding police psychology is not the only thing that needs to be updated in this field: blogging and creating a strong online presence is also important in order to help cops deal with police stress.

I often hear the question, “Is blogging really important? Can blogging really have a strong impact on your company and the world?” The answer to this is an emphatic “yes.” A “yes” with an exclamation point. Blogging can be extremely beneficial for your company and your own personal career advancements, and I’m going to explain why. But first, let’s explore the history behind blogging.

The History of the Blog

Although blogging seems very popular today, this wasn’t always the case. The first blog was actually not created until 1994, when a college student named Justin Hall decided to share his favorite links and ideas with his friends and the world. At this time, he had to manually upload links to a website he called Links.net. In 1997, Jorn Barger coined the term “weblog,” replacing the term “personal webpage” that Hall had used. Eventually, this term was shortened further into the common “blog” that we know today.

Blogs pretty quickly gained popularity. In 1998, The Charlotte Observer blogged Hurricane Bonnie in order to provide the public with live updates on the hurricane before their competitors. Quickly, blogs were not just used for personal updates and the news, but they spread into the political and corporate spheres. Blogs have also sparked a number of controversies. For instance, when political candidates make controversial comments, it is often blogs that call the public’s attention to these facts. One famous example of this was when U.S. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott made a comment in support of Thurmond, who was a supporter of racial segregation. This comment was largely overlooked in the media, however, many bloggers called attention to his comment, creating a strong outpouring of unrest among the public. In addition, in 2002, Heather Armstrong was fired for bashing her employer and discussing her job on her blog. “Dooced” (named after her blog) became a verb that means, “fired for blogging,” and can be found in the Urban Dictionary, and has even been used as a question on Jeopardy!

But not only that, a 2009 mainstream movie, entitled Julie & Julia, documented the true-story of a food blogger. In this movie, which won many academy awards, Julie Powell (played by Amy Adams) decides to challenge herself to cook every single recipe recorded in one of Julia Childs (played by Meryl Streep) recipe books in one year. Powell documented her journey on a blog, and this whole experience changed her life completely. Interspersed with scenes based on Child’s autobiography, this film explores how the advent of blogging can change a person in many ways, providing people with new meaning and purpose. This film is the first major motion picture that is based on a blog.

And then there is the best blogger out there, Stan, the Dog with a Blog. It is a Disney show about a talking dog that blogs about his secret ability and canine views to the delight of an audience in the millions. Now that is a blog I wish I could read weekly.

Since its beginnings, blogging has amassed a strong following, escalating to hundreds of thousands of blog posts being updated every day. Amid all this clutter and noise from the blogosphere, you must be asking yourself, “So is there any point in creating my own blog?” Well, like I said earlier, you should definitely invest the time and effort in doing so. In fact, I’m going to make the claim that if you don’t have a blog that you update regularly with interesting and original content, your company can end up a little behind the times.

The Benefit of a Blog

Blogs are beneficial to your company for a number of reasons: they increase your company’s visibility on the web, drive traffic to your website, increase your rankings, help you develop better costumer relationships and build trust, and they even mark your company and brand as a leader in your respective industries. How?

When you write an interesting article on a topic that your client-base cares about (for instance, if you are a clothing store owner, you should write about your products and how to style them), they will want to explore your website. This also proves to them that you know what you are talking about, that they can trust your expertise and opinions. You’re not just telling them that you’re the best, you’re showing them and proving to them why you are worth their time and money by writing blog posts that demonstrate your knowledge and skills. In other words, blogging is a way for you to market not just your products, but your skills for business and services, as well. The more varied posts you write, the more you are proving to the world that you are a well-versed expert, and an authority in your field.

In addition, blogging helps you get your brand image and your vision out there for people to see. When embedded in a website, it increases your search engine rankings so you will be positioned higher on the lists. Lastly, when you communicate your ideas in your blog and reply to other people’s comments, you are building relationships with the consumer. In the future, they will turn to you for your advice, for your product, for your skill, and for your company.

Now, here is a benefit that wouldn’t be obvious. Blogging helps you personally by helping you organize your thought. If you are an older person, it helps you put on paper what you have learned through the year. If you are a younger person, it helps you to learn more things by researching the content. And there is probably a strong therapeutic effect of getting out opinions and ideas. It generally is pure magic for catharsis in these ways.

So can you change the world with a blog post? Maybe not the whole world yet, but definitely a part of your world. You can influence thousands and hundreds of thousands of people who read your blog and learn to trust your advice. You can get recognition for your company, and you can create a new organization to the way people view something. Should you start a Blog? Decide what you want to achieve and go for it. My goal was to bring police psychology to the forefront of law enforcement officer’s minds and make officers more aware of police psychology. What will yours be?

 

  1. Police psychology: simple stepsWrite frequently and get others to write for you.   Writing is like anything else, the more you do it, the better it is. Guest blog for others first, maybe even for a year. You must get in the habit of writing frequently and in one format. You can only do that through writing.
  2. Write original content. You can have a blog that reproduces others works, but the most effective blogs produce their own content. If this is too much of a challenge, or too time consuming, get some college kids or graduate student to write first drafts for you. Remember, people love being reminded of what they already know and have forgotten.
  3. Listen to your viewers—if they request a certain topic, write it for them, reply to their comments, communicate with them, listen to their ideas and critiques, etc. An open ear beats an open mouth all the time and in blogs that is crucial.

Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D.

Please share this article from down below.

Please join the email list on the top of the sidebar and you can get these sent to you email box.

Come back regularly for more updated blogs on police psychology

Share this Article:

Let’s Talk Numbers

By Yocheved “Ayden” Pahmer

Police Psychology — let’s talk numbers. There are many cops out there. In fact, according to studies done by the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, there are over 1.1 million cops in the United States. That number doesn’t include part-time employees, volunteers, or support staff. Further, these numbers are from way back in 2008—the numbers have increased significantly since then. With numbers as great as this, it is not surprising that a few of these individuals take advantage of the resources available online. For example, the Facebook site for Law Enforcement Today has 411,132 people that liked it (as of September 25, 2015). PoliceOne on Facebook has 716,435 likes.

There are 151,604 people with a “Police Officer” title on LinkedIn, and 33, 318 listed as Police Chiefs. You do much better when you search for individuals with a “Law Enforcement” title on LinkedIn, but bear in mind that such a qualification includes a lot of different professions under its broad banner. In fact, according to a study by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), only 23.1% of police departments in the United States use LinkedIn.

Many departments are considering implementing social media training for their officers. According to the IACP study, 71.7% of agencies have a social media policy already in place; an additional 12.2% are currently creating a policy or plan to create one. The benefits to encouraging police officers and police departments to use the Internet and social media website are countless. One specific benefit, however, is that it will open the door for many cops to take advantage of the vast online resources available to them. This same IACP study shows that many cops are concerned about their personal safety when it comes to creating accounts on various social media websites. The training their department can provide can help teach these cops how to navigate the dangers of social media and avoid any and all pitfalls.

How to Build Online Connections

So, the cops that do not currently have any online presence are really beyond our reach when it comes to connecting with other cops on the Internet. But how do you go about contacting and connecting with cops that are on the Internet? Well, perhaps the easiest method, and one that my boss has me implementing personally, is go onto LinkedIn, search for people with a “police officer” or “law enforcement” title, and then connect with them. You will not be able to connect with everyone, but systematically go through all the results and connect with whomever you can. Once they accept your connection, it’s always a good idea to send them a nice, personalized email to tell them who you are and thank them for connecting back. Then, once you connect with them, you can scroll through their connections, and connect with those connections in turn. In our office we have only begun this process really, but we connected to 1500 officers we weren’t connected with before in a very short time.

Another way to connect with people is by looking online for information about different conferences and police retreats. For example, the Society for Police and Criminal Psychology has a website that describes their annual conference. If you don’t have the time or resources to attend these conferences, you can still scroll through the conference programs, read the abstracts of the presenters, and find the researchers on Facebook or LinkedIn, and connect with them there. Make sure to include a personalized letter explaining that you read about their research and are interested in the same field of study. The National Law Enforcement Officers website describes some events you may want to look at.

The Problem With Age

There is one important consideration that cannot be ignored: age demographics. Bear in mind, the most popular social media websites, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Pinterest attract a much younger demographic. Pew Research Center suggests that as many as 41% of older individuals do not go online frequently, let alone use the Internet to communicate with other people (and don’t even get me started on their cell phone use, or lack thereof). Further, it was suggested that as many as 56% of them indicated that they would require assistance if they wanted to use any of these “new” websites, such as Facebook or Twitter. There is definitely an upward trend here (a few years ago, numbers were closer to 20% of these older people using the Internet), but when we’re talking about a field that is saturated more with older individuals than many other fields, sometimes you will get skewed data. This may account for why there are not as many police officers online as you would expect given how many there are in reality. It’s important for these individuals to understand, however, that sometimes change is good. Not just good—great, beneficial, even. It may be difficult to get started, but once you do, you’ll see how useful Internet resources and Internet connections really are.

Now there are tons of communities that are “Law Enforcement Only” which are basically Facebook bulletin boards that have tens of thousands involved in them. I can look them, but I am unable to actually join them to find out their numbers (they’re law enforcement only). It might be interesting to combine with a cop and go after some of those sites as well. The possibilities are endless in the social media market.

Overall, the Internet can provide a new frontier in which you can connect with other like-minded individuals who share your interests, profession, and even many of your experiences. Now all we need to do is go out there and connect with as many of these individuals as we can. Cops are already seen as a tight fraternity, a family, a brotherhood, a sisterhood. But, together, we can build up this community even more.

Yocheved “Ayden” Pahmer is a senior at Yeshiva University in psychology wanting to be a police psychologist. She is applying to graduate school. Last school year she started working as a paid intern with Dr. Gary Aumiller and now writes first drafts of this blog for him.  This blog was not edited by Dr. Aumiller.  She is presenting a poster at the Society conference.

Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D.

Please share this article from down below.

Please join the email list on the top of the sidebar and you can get these sent to you email box.

Come back regularly for more updated blogs on police psychology

Share this Article:

Police Psychology |

The War on Police: “Officer-Directed Violence”

Ron Martinelli, Ph.D., CMI-V, BCFT, CFA

Shannon Miles

Shannon Miles

Deputy Darren Goforth

Deputy Darren Goforth

Let’s see a show of hands. Every one of you who recognize these names raise em up. Michael Brown? Freddie Grey? OK. Now how about Darren Goforth, Steven Vincent, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu? No hands? That’s not all that surprising to me as a forensic criminologist and police expert.

Unless you have been hiding under a rock for the past year, you would know that Michael Brown was the felony robbery suspect who assaulted and was shot and killed by a police office in Ferguson, MO. This incident precipitated the forensically false “Hand up. Don’t shoot!” narrative that led to nightly riots and the destruction of parts of the minority business district in that town.

Freddy Grey, as most of us know, was the drug dealing street person in Baltimore, MD, who resisted arrest and died in police custody quite possibly as a result of banging his head against the steel bolted walls of a police transport van. To date, the autopsy results show no direct linkage between Grey’s injuries and police brutality. Yet, six Baltimore police officers have been indicted in his death. Again, anonymous “activist” looters pillaged and burned portions of that city’s minority and elderly community.

Now for the name you may not be familiar with. Darren Goforth, was the Harris County, Texas Deputy Sheriff who was brutally executed this past weekend in an unprovoked and cowardly ambush by a suspect identified as Shannon Miles. Police arrested Miles shortly after the killing and so far he’s not talking. Deputy Goforth and Shannon Miles had never met each other and no connection between has been established. The media so far state that “the motive in the murder of Deputy Goforth is unknown.” Are you kidding me?! Here’s a motive for you. A war against police.

Make no mistake about it. The law enforcement community is under attack. Factually, more peace officers have been injured or killed this year alone than U.S. soldiers deployed overseas on the so called “War on Terrorism.” You didn’t know this? Why not? What you ask is causing this spike in what I refer to as “Officer-Directed Violence?” Well, I’ll tell you.

As a retired cop and now a forensic and behavioral expert; I have investigated hundreds of critical incidents resulting from violent encounters between citizens and police. In fact, my Forensic Death Investigations & Independent Review Team specializes in police-related death cases. Here is what I have found so far.

The uber liberal news media continues to forward a false message to an under or misinformed public that that police are inherently racist and violent.

Rather than endorsing and championing a message that the law enforcement and urban crime plagued communities need to support each other; these actors seem to thrive on creating distrust, dissention and division between police and the public. Of course, they all unanimously deny this is the case. So, what is to be believed? Let’s make you the forensic investigator to analyze a couple of cases from this past week alone.

Last week Louisiana State Trooper Steven Vincent was deliberately ambushed, shot and killed by Kevin Daigle, 54 years old, when the 44 year old officer stopped to render assistance to Daigle who had been involved in a single car accident. So far, the investigation has revealed that Trooper Vincent and suspect Daigle had never met each other. On Trooper Vincent’s dashcam audio, suspect Daigle is heard to taunt the hapless and mortally wounded trooper, saying, “You’re lucky. You’re going to die soon.” Daigle was neither wanted nor mentally deranged. Nothing the trooper did provoked the shooting.

trooper Steven Vincent

trooper Steven Vincent

Kevin Daigle

Kevin Daigle

In case you might think that there is a racial theme to this article, Trooper Vincent and his murderer were both white. From what we are now learning about murder suspect Shannon Miles’ cold-blooded murder of TX Deputy Sheriff Goforth; like murder suspect Daigle, Miles was also neither wanted by police, nor mentally disturbed. It appears that Miles and Daigle just wanted to kill a cop. But why?

Unprovoked, deliberate, cold blooded murders are actually rare occurrences. Yet, now the stories of murdered officers and the booking photos of their killers appear with far greater frequency on our TV screens now than in past years. We all know that police work is dangerous. For the most part, police are trained and train themselves in officer safety tactics. Responding to violent domestic disputes, armed robberies, gang fights, and active shooters are all part of the job. We accept it. It’s what we do and what the public we serve expect from us. It’s that simple.

However, this new dynamic of the wanton, willful and cowardly assassination of peace officers by ambush is a paradigm shift in the dynamic of officer-directed violence. It is an act of urban terrorism that is no different than if an ISIS cell member had planted and exploded IED under a police officer’s patrol car. There is NO difference because at the end of the day you still have a dead officer that resulted from an unprovoked attack. The purpose of terrorism is not only to kill innocents; but to psychologically paralyze the masses by instilling fear and breaking down the will to fight. Creating fear and submission through random acts of violence is central to the behavioral profile of the terrorist.

Very few of those involved in activist movements are protesting police brutality, racism or oppression. What they are protesting is the rule of law and police-community efforts to fight crime and violence to make communities drug, gang and violence free. That is the real war in America right now. Don’t be naïve. Our law enforcement officers comprise the “Thin Blue Line” of soldiers who separate and protect the innocent from the predatory criminals and the entitled, exploitive “users” who want a lawless society.

When national, state and municipal leaders criticize police for political reasons absent forensic proof; they not only polarize the law enforcement minority communities; but light the fuses of the mentally unbalanced “ticking time bombs” among us who take this dangerous rhetoric as a sign to commit future acts violence upon the police and their communities.

Do you think I’m offering a false narrative? Well then riddle me this. Do the last two names on my list, Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu ring any bells? Well, they should. On December 21, 2014 Anti-Crime Unit NYPD Officers Ramos and Liu were peacefully sitting in their patrol car when they were suddenly approached and shot point blank in the head execution style by suspect Ismaaiyl Brinsley, 26.

Ramos, Liu, BrinsleyPrior to assassinating the officers, Brinsley had ominously posted on his Instagram account, “I always wanted to be known for doing something right. I’m putting wings on pigs today.” His angry rants on social media indicated that he was going to murder police officers in retaliation for the officer-involved shooting/killing of felony robbery and police assault suspect Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO. Like his murderous and cowardly criminal colleagues Miles and Daigle, Ismaaiyl Brinsley was neither a wanted man nor mentally unstable. So what would cause this man to believe in his heart that he was “doing something right?”

Why would anyone think that the cold-blooded killing of police officers simply sitting in their patrol car; pumping gas; or seeking to assist a motorist in distress as doing the right thing? I’ll tell you why. It’s in large part because national, state, or local leaders they respect; activists who refer to themselves as men of God; and a news media that they trust tell them that the police are violent racists who shoot and kill people who are somehow involved in innocent or benign criminal behavior. “Hands up. Don’t shoot.” If you don’t believe me, then just watch the evening news where you will see protesting crowds walking down streets chanting, “Making bacon; pigs in a blanket.” What do you think they are referring to but the assassination of police officers?

So for me and my brothers and sisters in law enforcement, it all comes down to this. America is at a critical turning point. We can either be destroyed by ISIS and Al Qaeda terrorists from outside of our borders; or we can be destroyed from within by lawless criminal predators and society’s violent criminal activists and police haters. You choose.

The independent monitoring, professional investigation and criminal/civil prosecution of alleged and actual police misconduct is important in any free society. Peaceful protests forwarding this agenda is also appropriate, healthy and needed. However, what is largely happening throughout our nation right now is neither.

It is a forensic fact that only an extremely small percentage of the 900,000 peace officers in this nation act outside the bounds of the law. Police also do a far better job removing bad officers from their ranks than the State Bars do nationally to rid the justice system of bad attorneys; or the commissions on judicial responsibility do in removing incompetent or corrupt judges. That’s another fact.

Honest, hard-working police officers want the bad apples in law enforcement punished and gone as much, or more than you do. However, police officers will not tolerate any threats to their well-being and neither will those of us like me who support them.

So as a law enforcement community and as fellow Americans my brothers and sisters in blue and khaki and I ask you now. Where do you stand?

Stop supporting politicians, the media, corrupt activists and people you know who continue to forward false narratives that encourage and empower police hate, urban terrorism and the destruction of the rule of law. Stand up for law enforcement. Decry the false, hateful and anti-police rhetoric. Push back against politicians and activists who seek to polarize us. Work to strengthen the bridges of unity between police and the public by supporting law enforcement. If you don’t take a positive stand to support your protectors; we will certainly see America slowly but surely destroyed from within. It’s your choice. The real truth here is that ALL lives matter!

Ron Martinelli, Ph.D., is a forensic criminologist, Certified Medical Investigator and police expert who directs the nation’s only multidisciplinary Forensic Death Investigations & Independent Review Team.  Visit his police and forensics social media site at www.DrRonMartinelli.com

References

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_in_the_War_in_Afghanistan

http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf

http://www.statista.com/statistics/262894/western-coalition-soldiers-killed-in-afghanistan/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/21/us/new-york-police-officers-shot/

http://ktla.com/2014/12/20/2-nypd-officers-shot-ambush-style-in-critical-condition-alleged-shooter-dead-from-self-inflicted-gunshot-wound-cnn/

 

Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D.

Please share this article from down below.

Please join the email list on the top of the sidebar and you can get these sent to you email box.

Come back regularly for more updated blogs on police psychology

Share this Article:

Police Psychology | Officers Disproportionally Killing Black Men:  Another False Narrative

 

martinelli image

One difficult topic discussed in police psychology is with regards to racial profiling.

Among several prominent false narratives being unethically forwarded by anti-law enforcement activists and an uninformed media is that police officers kill black men at a rate that is disproportionate to other races. Those who criticize police following officer-involved shootings and in-custody deaths immediately allege racism is the root cause. But is this factually accurate and fair? A recent study by University of Toledo criminal justice professor Dr. Richard Johnson shows that this is not the case.[1]

 

In researching the most recent data from the FBI on homicides nationwide from January, 2009 to the end of 2012, of the 56,250 homicides reported during that period, 1,491 were the result of police uses of force. [2] This equates to roughly 372 persons a year dying as a result of police force intervention.

 

 Of the 1,491 persons who died as a result of police uses of force, 61.4% were white males, 32.2% were black males and 3.2% were males from other races. Females dying as a result of a police use of force comprised the final 3.2% of deaths.

 

 By comparison, of the 56,259 homicides reviewed from 2009 – 2012, 19,000 or nearly 39% involved the killing of black males. Of these, only 2.5% involved the death of a black male as a result of a police use of force. In contrast to police officers, private citizen killings of black males in self-defense justifiable homicides at 3.4% were higher than black male deaths attributed to police. What stands out as a significant and shocking statistic is that 17,719 criminal homicides (murders) of black males, or 93.3% from 2009 – 2012 were at the hands of other criminals who were predominately other black males (89.6%).

 

 In sharp contrast to the false narrative that police officers have some racial motivation to kill black men, from 2009 – 2012, nearly 41% of police officers were murdered by black males; whereas only 32.2% of homicides of black males were attributed to a police use of force. This is significant, given the fact that blacks as a whole comprise only 13% of the U.S. population of 316,128,839 persons and there are less than 500,000 peace officers in this country, many who do not work in a street patrol capacity.

 

To put this study into perspective, an average of 120 black males, or one out of every 173,871 black males die yearly as a result of police uses of force. This is compared to 2,369 black males being killed in motor vehicle accidents and 2,532 committing suicide each year. [3], [4] This means that the chance of a black male in the U.S. being killed by police during a use of force is roughly 0.00078% of one percent. In fact, when all homicide of black males statistics are considered, black males are 35 times more likely to be murdered by another black male; 20 times more prone to die in a motor vehicle accident or by suicide; and 21 times more susceptible to being killed in a self-defense justifiable homicide than killed by any police use of force.

 

Whereas, an average of 120 black males die each year as a result of a police use of force; 373 persons a year are struck by lighting. In essence, the chance that a black male dying as a result of police force intervention is considerably less than their chances of being struck by lighting.[5]

 

Just to provide some further context to this discussion, from 2009 – 2012, 224 police officers were murdered and nearly 60,000 sustained injuries from assaults by violently assaultive and/or resisting suspects.

 

The anti-law enforcement sentiment is rapidly growing in America and a number of false narratives are being forwarded by those who would seek to undermine the daily contributions of our brave men and women who honorably wear the badge and put themselves in harm’s way to keep our communities safe. Our best strategy is to remain vigilant, keep the uninformed masses and media informed and to keep the faith.

References

1 “Examining the Prevalence of Death from Police Use of Force,” Johnson, Richard, Ph.D., © 2015, University of Toledo

2 U.S. Dept. of Justice, FBI Uniform Crime Report Supplemental Homicide Reports and U.S. Center for Disease Control death classifications, Jan. 2009 – Jan. 2012.

3 National Safety Council, Injury Facts (2012), www.nsc.org

4 www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/suicide/statistics/aag.html

5 www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/basics/wlighting.htm

 

Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D. ABPP

To follow me on this blog fill in your email address and click at left of page at the top of the sidebar

 Please share this with other people on your social network from down below.

 For books by Dr. Gary S. Aumiller got to http://www.myherodad.com or http://www.myheromom.com

Join me on Facebook or Linkedin (see sidebar).

 Sign up to receive updates for more posts on the latest in police psychology.

Share this Article: