The Police Candidate Interpretive Report
I had one of the first cell phones for public consumption. It fit in a bag. The battery lasted minutes not hours, and it was essentially a car phone that could be moved around. But visions of Dick Tracy’s watch and Agent 86’s shoe danced in my head, and I walked around feeling real important when I pulled out my bag phone and made a call. How sweet those youthful delusions were!
While I was running around looking for my Agent 99, Steven Jobs was getting fired from Apple. But Jobs had vision and timing. He knew when something was needed and he saw sort of saw into the future. When he was rehired, he was going to hire a Pepsi Executive for Apple and asked him “do you want to make sugared water the rest of your life or change the world.” Jobs then designed a new operating system that became the basis for IPhone, IPods and yes, an IWatch that you could talk into, straight from the old Dick Tracy cartoons. My old fantasies are sort of dumb given they now exist.
I sat with the Steven Jobs of Police Psychology in Orlando Florida at an IACP Police Psychologists happy hour. He wanted to get the American Psychological Association to recognize police psychology and tie police psychology practice into research. In my best “Pinky and the Brain” imitation, I wanted to rule the world, or at least globalize the profession. Through the Society for Police and Criminal Psychology I started trying to define exactly what tasks were in the profession, what did police psychologists actually do? Across the country, my friend was starting the same task, so we combined efforts. He later spearheaded the work making police psychology recognized by the American Psychological Association. But his recent activity may be the most poignant for the practice of police psychology.
He took an old standard test in police evaluations that was recently reconstructed, and took tons of data and put it into a computer-generated report on how police officers can be selected for police departments. Then he made it so the computer would generate not only statistical properties for the test, but also a list of references in the back tying the research to the employee behavior. Literally, you could say I got this result and here are the references that support the denial of a job, or the calling of this person unfit for duty. Forensic evaluations are always supposed to be referenced but seldom are. Imagine going into the court and having all the references at your fingertips. And it is an entirely transparent process.
Gone are the days when a psychologist looks at the scale and gets a feel for them being a good cop or not. Now we can directly tie scores on the MMPI-2 RF to police officer behavior. I remember Dr. Mike Aamodt’s book with all the meta-analyses saying basically none of the tests, except at the far reaches of the spectrum lead statistically to any decision. There is really a new world out there and someone has seen how to make it more viable.
I don’t do testing as a matter of course, so probably I have some things wrong, but the intent is correct. Dr. Dave Corey with excellent researcher Dr. Yossef Ben-Porath has really achieved his goal. He gave police psychology the recognition by the APA that it deserves and he is making the field which he works in, employee screening and assessment, highly attached to research. Kudos to him and to Pearson for publishing the Police Candidate Interpretive Report (PCIR). It’s the IWatch of our profession.
As for me, I am still trying to rule the world. Maybe if I write a blog….
Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D. ABPP
Follow me on this blog fill in your email address and click at left of page at the top of the sidebar
Please share this with other people on your social network from down below.
Join me on Facebook or Linkedin (see sidebar).
If you enjoyed this stress tip, sign up to receive updates for more posts on the latest in police psychology.