Police Psychology | Humor and Culture

Posted: January 14, 2016 in Public Information Bureau
Tags: , ,

Police Psychology | Humor and Culture


I was lecturing on police psychology to a conference crowd in Singapore, and I had included a funny metaphor of the development of the Apollo moon vehicle by NASA to show the rigidity in police organizations. The Police Psychology, horses ass punch line is that NASA, like police organizations, relied on decisions based on the rear ends of horses centuries before. It is a funny and amusing story and gets from a small chuckle to a major minute’s ovation in America when it is finished. In Asia, the audience felt I was insulting the police commissioner who they liked a lot (and I did too). Since it was my opening story, I sort of lost that audience as they would cringe every time I started a new story or joke. I guess you could say it was Zen – “be the horse’s rear end.” I became the rear end of the horse. With over 450 keynote addresses in my life, this was one of two that I hated intensely.

Laughter is the world’s best medicine. Or is it? Unlike vaccines and typical pharmaceutical drugs, humor is not necessarily universal. What we find funny here in the United States may be considered offensive in other countries. Humor can be vastly different from person to person, culture-to-culture, religion-to-religion, and even among sexual orientations. Everyone enjoys some form of humor, however, the humor that is enjoyed and valued may be vastly different depending on the person’s background, exposure and beliefs.

Charles Darwin explored the adaptive ability of humor and concluded that

humor has an evolutionary function. When people laugh, it builds camaraderie and boosts feelings of connectedness and sociability among people. Freud claimed that laughter released tension from our unconscious anxieties and troubles. We are born with the ability to smile, and in fact some monkeys even have the ability to laugh. A smile is a universal ability—everyone in every culture smiles. It is true, in the western world, people are known to smile more easily and frequently than in other parts of the world, but everyone still appreciates a good joke.

The Relative Nature of Humor

However, a “good joke” is entirely relative. Studies suggest that Americans appreciate sexual humor a lot more than individuals from conservative cultures in which religion is paramount. However, individuals from many of these countries value violent jokes a lot more than Americans. I remember when I visited southern police stress, police psychology, horses assRussia in the winter of 2009, there were very few people smiling, except in café’s where they played Tom and Jerry cartoons on the TV sets. From Babushka to soldier, the old cat and mouse game inevitably ending in cat pain brought out a huge smile and laughter.

In some cultures, laughing or expressing intense emotions in public is frowned upon, so even if something funny occurs, laughing would be considered impolite. In addition, some language structures make it impossible for humor to be translated across cultures. In America, many of our punch lines appear at the end of our sentences, but that would be impossible to do so in the German language. Certainly language structure accounts for some of the fact that humor can get lost in translation, but that is not the full story.

I remember reading a story about an article in The Onion, where Kim Jung Un was listed as one of the sexiest men alive. It was reprinted in a Korean newspaper. No one there understood that it was meant to be a joke. All you have to do is look at the scandal surrounding “The Interview” to see how various cultures find completely different things funny. In America, people were lauding the movie as being hysterical and well worth a watch. In many Asian countries, the movie was seen as offensive and rude. Perhaps this is the perfect example of why cross-cultural humor can be so dangerous. It is easy to cross the line from funny into offensive without really being aware that you are doing so. Holocaust jokes are not funny if you are telling them to a Jew. Homosexual jokes are not funny if you are making fun of your gay or lesbian friend. And jokes about North Korea are not funny to the people who live there. It is a fine line, but a line that must be respected non-the-less.

Humor also has different functions depending on the culture. In America, we learn to use humor to diffuse tension or ease a situation, it a defense mechanism we engage in when we are uncomfortable. In many Asian cultures, however, humor is used as an educational tool, to emphasize a point, or clarify a concept.

The Universal Nature of Humor

Despite differences in humor, there are some things that are universally funny. The Incongruity-Resolution (IR) theory was first created by Immanuel Kant in the 18th century. This theory states that humor or laughter arises automatically when we are presented by something surprising or unexpected. That’s why the punch line is normally at the end of sentences to surprise people. This also explains why some people laugh when they see someone else fall down or walk into a glass door or do something else embarrassing. Kant explained people in all cultures and religions laugh at incongruity and their resolutions. It’s just that different societal structures prompt different types of incongruities. Of course, Kant also explained the differences between rationalism and empiricism in epistemology (the science of knowledge), so he may not be the most fun of your philosophers.

 Elliot Aronson described when someone finds humor or likableness after they make a mistake or a blunder. He called it the “Pratfall Effect.” It is often used in marketing with one of our idols doing something out of the character for their competence level. In marketing, some call it the “blemishing effect.” So when the cat, who is usually the aggressor in cat-mouse relationships, gets beaten everyone laughs and smiles, but if the cat were to win and eat the mouse, that’s not entertainment. You’re funnier when you lose.

 I returned to Singapore three years later for a shorter speech for the same conference. I tripped on the way to the podium, told an anecdote of pain for me, was unpredictable when I presented a children’s book for every person in the audience instead of talking about police stuff, and made sure to compliment the commissioner of police. It went over big and I went from horse’s rear end to riding the horse. You gotta learn from your failures. The conference is every three years and I’ll be lecturing again this year. I wonder if I should break out Tom and Jerry cartoons for my backdrop!

Blog Administrator: Gary S. Aumiller, Ph.D. ABPP

Please share this article from down below.

Please join the email list on the top of the sidebar and you can get these sent to your email.

Come back regularly for more updated blogs on police psychology



Share this Article:
  1. Anne says:

    When I do presentations for first responders I discuss ‘dark humor.’ The purpose of dark humor is to dehumanize the decided or distance the handler from the humanness of the deceased (Deahl, 2000). He wrote about the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in Scotland. An oil platform sank, and many people drown. Police officers searching for bodies needed to reappraise their experience. “Sir, when I go in there, as far as I am concerned I’m going to a spaceship looking for Martians.
    This is not a new idea. In 1978, The cult leader Jim Jones convinced 913 of his followers to drink grape Flavor-Aid laced with with poison in Guyana. Imagine hundreds of dead bodies bloating in the hot humid weather. “During the Jonestown detail, the grosser the joke, the better (Jones, 1985).

    Humor as a coping mechanism is good to remember when working with first responders who shyly admit to telling bad jokes and/or feel bad about it later.
    …obviously not in front of the victim’s families or the media….but you get the point.
    Thanks Gary.

Leave a Reply